The very first marriage counselling session is vital for setting the stage for the journey that ought to be the marriage repair that the couple require. Some are tune-ups, and some are overhauls, and some, I’m afraid to say, are salvage for the scrapyard. But there ought always to be hope for some form of reconciliation for peace, whatever the state of any relationship, together or separated.
Naturally,
the couple will be keen to dive right into the present issues, particularly to
deal with dysfunction around communication and conflict resolution. But,
believe it or not, there’s something more primary.
Surely,
we will discuss much more than the following dozen points of an unexhaustive
list, but we must have some structure to be guided by God by; structure gives
purpose and hope; it sets direction; it gives us something to trust as we seek
God for the help only the Lord can provide.
I’ve
learned the need for structure the hard way; when I trusted a process of
guiding couples without structure and did them and I and God a great
disservice. So, structure is necessary. It is the guiding light of God’s holy
wisdom.
Here
are some of the general points that need to be part of the first session, in no
particular order:
1.
What work have you done on your marriage previously?
Have you done a Prepare-Enrich inventory
or similar? What do you already know about yourselves from previous marriage
counsellors and mentors. What tools are you already equipped with? We need wisdom
to quantify where the issues reside, and what to work on first.
2.
Teaching
will be provided. It goes without saying that a lot of time can be
needlessly consumed and wasted on red herrings that end up making matters
worse. Getting torn up on present conflicts that only retraumatise, for
instance. Marriage counselling is a place not only to hash things out, it’s a
place to learn and discover. The counselling relationship is intended to model
safety. It needs structure. Teaching the tools to equip the couple is an
inherent part of good structure. I teach PeaceWise, Transactional Analysis,
boundaries in marriage, languages of apology, among a host of other tools
depending on what’s required.
3.
If you’re committed Christians, what is your theology for marriage? The hope is there is agreement
on whether an egalitarian or complementarian approach is best. My bent is
toward an egalitarian approach, but if the couple in the room with me are both
won to complementarianism then that’s fine with me. There must be a shared
vision for marriage. Most of all, what is most fundamental about marriage
is that it is about loving the other to such a degree that we are consumed less
by our desires and more by what we can give them, this gift that God has placed
into our hands for companionship and safekeeping.
4.
Talking about vision, and this is pertinent especially
for those in second marriages and blended families, I like to know what vision the marriage partners have for cohesive
family in the broader context of the word ‘family’ i.e. with ex-partners and
families. My preference is for a vision where the broader family can get
along and do so without faking it. Though sometimes we do need to fake it until
we make it. A cohesive broader family context is such a gift to the children.
It is a vision for the best kind of reconciliation possible in a broken
circumstance. How will celebrations of our children’s eighteenth and twenty-first’s
possibly be joyous occasions where parents and step-parents get along as
friends, or at least be friendly? It has to be a vision we work toward.
5.
What
gauge do you have for your own baggage? What self-awareness is there? And
is that perception of good self-awareness shared by your partner? Most of us
think we’re further along the growth path than we actually are. Does your
partner think you are self-aware, and of equal importance, able to manage your
emotionality? We all have more work to do; we never truly ‘arrive’. Our
perceptions of our own humility and character, in the context of marriage, are
often bloated beyond reality. And that is okay. That is pretty normal. It’s
time to be brutally honest. Honesty will never kill us, but pride can end
marriages or at least kill them of the kind of life they ought to have. We need
also to recognise that growth is dependent on a change of mind at a heart
level; only a change of mind at a heart level (Christians call it repentance)
creates sustained changed behaviour.
6.
For those in second marriages, what baggage are you reading into your present partner from previous
partner/s? It’s common to see in a present partner what we struggled with
and ultimately rejected in our former partner. It is often a default, because
our vision is now piqued or skewed a particular way. Could it be true that we
might have a bend toward a certain kind of perception? What stories are we
unconsciously saying to ourselves? Is a skewed perception preventing you from
seeing what is virtuous and acceptable about your present partner? Baggage will
always prevent contentment in marriage.
7.
A warning needs to be issued: please expect matters in your marriage to get worse before they get
better. Too many times we see that marriage counselling as the silver
bullet when in all reality most people leave counselling far too late when
significant damage has already been done. Undoing the damage takes time. A fair
expectation for change is 1-2 years. Why should we be in a hurry? What’s most
important is the willingness to begin the work, and the commitment to follow it
through. All I’m saying is it is challenging work. Counselling is necessary,
but most of the work is done by the couples applying
the principles spoken about. It all takes time.
8.
Two questions for me as the helper in the session are,
1) ‘Lord, make me aware of what I need to be aware of in this situation, Amen’;
and 2) ‘Lord, am I seeking to serve this couple or to exert power?’ I am a
helper and I am responsible. I recognise I have power, and that power is
influence. It’s a precious thing I must take seriously. I want you to know that I want you to challenge me if ever you feel it
necessary. I am aware of the power I have and need to help you. But, relationally
we are equals here. That said, I want you to be aware that your perceptions are
yours alone, and they need to be tested with others to see if they are shared,
otherwise they are only your truth and not the
truth.
9.
As dynamics develop in the session itself, the above
questions need to be at the forefront of my mind and thinking, even to the extent of discerning whether each
partner in the couple is seeking to serve the other or to exert power. We
are always aiming to serve the other and die to self. Wherever we cannot model
that there will be a gentle bringing to account.
10.
Where does the Third Entity feature in your marriage? Is God central in the Presence of your marriage?
Do you take things to the Lord, individually about yourselves and together as a
couple? Does God convict you of your sin? Does God help you get the log out of
your own eye? Does that then lead to confession, apology, forgiveness and
restoration? Again, I teach PeaceWise.
11.
I want you to leave your first session, and do this in
subsequent sessions too, prepared not to
react angrily with your partner for what they said or did not say or for
anything they did. Take it to the Lord for a day or three. Raise it only in
a productive way. Value and exemplify the safety we will model in this counselling
process.
12.
Finally, I am
going to ask you to trust me. This may be a strange request given that you
are already trusting me. But what I am asking is that you would continue to
trust my guidance, especially when it is one of you only who wants to rescind
that trust. If one still trusts, the other ought to trust me enough to share
with me how I’ve hurt you or missed you. Challenge me. If you both are of one
accord to remove your trust I will respect your decision. By all means, test
what I say with others. If it isn’t from God, it needs to die.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.