DOXOLOGY is the praise of God, and sin is the absence of
praise, and it might well be true that violence is relationship without
doxology.
Violence is sin, but it’s also accurate to say that sin is
adequately described as violence — the two are synonymous. Seeking to be in relationship with another can
range from anything from a bliss-filled seeking to love the other, selflessly,
to needing the relationship in order to abuse the person. Sin runs rampant in the absence of right
relationship.
Violence is all about violation — the transgression of a
boundary that, in doing so, does not bring glory (praise) to God. Anything that hurts anyone is violence, and
that means anything, no matter how small, that brings about any harm requires
remediation. Of course, that takes not
only awareness, but courage, and if we don’t fall short in the first area, we
may well choose to turn a ‘blind’ eye to the intervention needed to correct the
violent matter.
Let’s hope we’re humble enough to redress situations where we’ve
violated people.
As Christians our avid concern is to not sin. We agree that we’re called to love one
another. And if we agree that sin is
violence, because in effect it’s the opposite of love, then we’ll become passionate
to chasten away to the last dregs any semblance of violence from our
lives. We might also be keen to call
attention to it in situations we witness directly. And that is our Christian mandate.
Let’s consider that violence (sin) is any practice that does
not have the praise of God in the front of its mind. It’s any time we think even ambivalently
about another person; it doesn’t need to be overt violence. It only needs to be a falling short.
And this is the problem with much of our modern day
church. It’s not the overt things we do
to aggress people, but it’s the little pieces of inaction we don’t take. Or it’s a missing of the mark by just a half
degree. Yet, a half degree might as well
be half a mile.
Violence can even be trying to maintain an appearance whilst not genuinely setting
out to answer the call of love. (Remember
the Pharisees and their fasting and almsgiving in Matthew 6.) Violence, this way, is the running of an anti-relational
agenda in the guise of a real interest in the relationship. It looks like love is front and centre, but,
tragically, there’s much violence done when ‘love’ is done only for appearance’s
sake.
We’ve talked fleetingly about the problem; let’s now proffer
a solution.
***
The only way to defeat violence is to declare war on it through
peace; by nonviolent activism, which is an active form of submission, and the
exercise of love that transcends the fear that violence seeks to generate.
Love is the divine accompaniment for life, and the only
accessory that adorns violence in a way to resolve it through reconciliation.
And there’s no better way for love to be expressed than
through the peace of adult demeanour — being rational, realistic, reliable,
responsible and logical. Reactive
emotions like anger, fear, disgust, and even surprise, are actually violent
reactions. The only worthy response in
declaring war on violence is to fight without fighting; to return love for the
violence experienced. And it’s not only
possible to do this, it’s also the best way to live under God’s power.
It’s futile fighting with a person who won’t fight back; who
insists on loving. And that’s the only
way to have victory in a war on violence.
The person who declares war on violence believes love is not
only bigger, but that love is also able to win the violator over to its
compelling agenda. The simple fact is,
when we’re won to love’s agenda, when we operate under its persuasive power, we
see the folly in violence. Violence’s
folly is in the fact it doesn’t have all parties at heart. Love knows that it wins hands down because
love looks after everyone.
Declaring war on violence is done best by loving through unemotional adult demeanour.
Violence cannot survive as it is when it’s faced with mature
adult responses. It has to change. So the key to winning a war over violence is
to find a way to fight with love, which is patient, kind, nor greedy or
boastful.
When faced with violence, love responds not out of fear, but
out of its own confidence that its way reigns supreme.
The only weapon to conquer violence is nonviolent activism;
to challenge the violator through a peaceful demeanour.
And yet, with all this said, there are situations of violence
that will confound any form of love we’ll bring. We can only but try! And it bears noteworthy consideration, this does
not apply to intentionally evil family and domestic violence — I will leave
that as a disclaimer.
© 2016 Steve Wickham.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.