Each of us, if we were true with
ourselves, has one of two base fears surrounding either intimacy (trust) or abandonment
(security). We may fear both, but one fear outstrips the other. These fears are
manifest in our personality by the way we were brought up in our childhoods.
This is about Attachment Theory.
If we desire emotional healing, we
will need to be honest enough to courageously explore whether trust or security
are problematic for us, toward fear.
If we were given to stereotyping
we’d say men struggle most with trust and women most with security. But such
estimations are misleading. I, for one male, struggle more for security than I
do in trusting. My attachment style, whilst primarily secure, verges on the
anxious and not at all dismissing (though at times my mind wanders into a
pattern of thinking that’s akin to a disorganised style of attachment—where I
lack the wellbeing of both security and
trust). So I may be atypical as a male—like many other males I know. Many women
I know don’t have security problems, but may have problems with trust.
We can surmise, then, that there
are few, if any, generalisations we can make regarding the barriers to
emotional healing.
In the present discussion, we are
imagining home as a place we want to
be able to safely leave (without it causing anxiousness) and trust enough to
return to. Home, here, is the
metaphor for any base, whether it is God, a spouse, a workplace situation, or
even a physical home.
The key question is, are we more
fearful of being abandoned by home or more fearful in trusting it—whatever
‘home’ is?
When we can easily move outward from ‘home’, away from people and
situations that make us feel secure, and we can move just as easily inward toward ‘home’, toward people, then
we can consider emotional healing to be well on its way.
Let us take each of these two ways
of emotional healing in turn:
Leaving Home Safely
For those of us who fear
abandonment most of all we are more naturally anxious. We are the passionate
ones who want to be praised for our enthusiasm. We are disappointed and
betrayed more easily than those who fear intimacy.
The good news is we have the wherewithal
and motivation to love.
Our trust is strong, but
sometimes, along with it, we are hurt. Emotional healing here is about learning
to take more risks in leaving our physical and relational comfort
zones. The more we can trust that our living situations won’t change whilst
we’re away, the less we’re shackled to them.
In leaving ‘home’ we should fret
less whilst we are away.
Returning Home to Trust
For those of us who fear intimacy,
trust is our growth opportunity—to grow towards people and more willingly and
freely love them. We might be quite ambivalent, even indifferent regarding
things others are more passionate about.
We may be told we don’t care
enough. It’s wrong; we do care, but we don’t make a big deal of things like
some others do. We can take or leave things.
We don’t understand why others
trust so easily, but secretly, inside ourselves, we may wish we could trust
people a little more and have the ability to get closer to some people;
particularly our loved ones—sons, daughters, mothers, fathers, etc.
Emotional healing here is about
getting out of our comfort zones in a different way; we need to take risks in approaching
people, and in trusting people, allowing them emotional access to us.
***
Two opportunities for emotional
healing come in growing past the fears for intimacy and abandonment. Such
opportunities for growth are about achieving a balance of wisdom between being
too passionate and not being passionate enough.
When we feel there are few
barriers to both trust and security we live in an emotionally healed way. We
are free to love and be loved and we fear being hurt less.
© 2013 S. J.
Wickham.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.