There are all sorts of drivers within each of us that motivate
us. In getting to know someone, we are essentially saying what motivates you is
important to me. In getting to know someone, we come to them with a presumed
acceptance of whoever we will encounter. We don’t know who we will encounter,
but we have faith that we will adapt to whoever they are, and we trust that the
interaction will be a positive one for them.
So, our premise in
meeting a person for the first time, in knowing nothing about them, but having
faith that 15 minutes with them will give us some stable platform with which to
continue the relationship, is to
communicate acceptance.
Firstly, we want to learn enough about them to be able to
explore more in subsequent meetings. Secondly, we want them to feel that we do
actually care, and that is the wonderful thing about care. We cannot fake it.
If we are genuinely interested, and we behave in a way that demonstrates such
interest, the unknown person before us usually invites us into a better
knowledge of themselves. That is always an honour and a privilege — to be
trusted enough to be invited into knowing them deeper.
Why is this? Why
do people invite us into themselves?
For the simple reason that it is so rare to be listened to these
days. People always want to do the talking. Almost nobody listens. The truth
is, we as people crave to be understood, we love to be listened to, and the
thought that somebody would be genuinely curious enough to spend time with us,
simply listening to us, is the unspoken prayer of our hearts. It’s not rocket
science. But it is deeply effective and renewing.
The encounter begins with the meet and greet, where we get to
know each other’s names, and special attention needs to be given to memorising
their name. I so often forget the person’s name, and even though I never do it
deliberately, in asking them their name again, I get the opportunity to
communicate how important knowing their name is to me, and I get to model an important
behaviour for our relationship; that of apology.
Nothing builds
relational credibility better than sincere apology.
There is no set way of engaging them in discussion. We can start
with family or with the work they do, or something they’re passionate about. It
is as simple as saying within ourselves, ‘I do not know enough about this
person.’ Our attitude toward them is ‘tell me more.’
All the time we are talking with someone we don’t know, they are
subconsciously checking whether we are truly interested or not. We demonstrate
that we are interested in proving that we are listening, in proving that we
understand the actual thing that they said, and that we can ask clarifying and
even specifying questions, which prove we are authentically curious about the specific
thing they are sharing with us. This is how intimacy is formed in
relationships. At this point we can see that intimacy can be described as into-ME-see. As they share with us they
are saying to us into-ME-see? They
are saying come on in, if you’re willing,
and see me for who I am, because I trust you will accept and respect the real
me.
Perhaps a point in the conversation comes when you misread them
or misunderstand them, and perhaps the fear of them rejecting us becomes real.
Oftentimes I find this is an opportunity. When we show resilience, and
apologise, yet we hang in within the conversation, we invite them to school us
in what we don’t know.
I almost pray that there are times of misunderstanding in our
first 15 minutes together, so I can prove to you that I’m fiercely redemptive
for our relationship.
What this means is
I’m prepared to be wrong for the betterment of the relationship.
It also means that if we have conflict I can bear the discomfort
of partial disconnection. This builds trust, and you begin to see me as a safe
person. What I am communicating is that if there is partial disconnection I
will seek to restore the relationship. Everybody
wants this. Anybody who allows anybody else into their world wants to know
that they are worth fighting for; that the relationship is important enough to
endure the pain of conflict and work through the discomfort toward a bigger
vision of restoration.
It is imperative to mention the obvious: that I must prove to actually
be a safe person, because I acknowledge that this information can be
weaponised by people who seek to manipulate people in relationships.