It happens in the simple movement of prayer, even as I am
perusing, of all things, Twitter. And I stumble across something that confounds
most men. It’s just as confounding for women, and frustrating for both genders.
As a husband myself I have been guilty many
times of asking my wife to please explain—“just tell me what to do and I will
do it”—never quite comprehending that it was my motivation that sucked.
Why on earth would women want to lead a grown
man by the hand and spoon feed him?
For him, it’s a case of “I’ll do what you
want…” but what he’s really communicating is, “Come on, just make it easy for
me. I do want to give you what you want.”
It’s kind of self-defeating. What is really
desired is that we would want to understand and not need to be told, because
quite frankly there are too many nuances in life to be told every single one.
Our wives are asking us to ‘man up’, which is a funny kind of term given that a
lot of the time they are living this
by example.
It’s like an incredulity that seems spellbindingly
obvious.
As one person put it in a message to all
partners (men mostly), “In reality,
we’ve told you. 4538 times. You don’t see that ‘the thing we’re mad about’
applies in different circumstances. Then you stereotype us about it, because we
won’t explain it to you AGAIN.”
~
The point is unless a person understands why you want them to do
something, they can’t agree to the ‘what’, because the why so often dictates
the what.
The what changes depending on the why. It’s only when we
understand the why that we begin to grasp how to contextualise our attitude and
behaviour to all those different circumstances the quote above talks about.
Standing in a wife’s shoes as she looks at a
husband who has very minimal commitment, we can see how infuriating it is. So
much for the ‘leader’ of the family (taking a complementarian approach).
We can appreciate how tired she is having to go
on and on and on about it; and then she is lambasted for nagging! She shouldn’t
have to nag. If there was a modicum of genuine interest, understanding might
not be a bridge too far! But there is only self-interest and any interest
invested in understanding is extrinsic at best. It should not be like this.
Message to self when I’m being a numbskull: she married you because she thought you’d be
up for partnership. Partnership is a phenomenon where both parties give
more or less equally. It isn’t good enough to throw our hands in the air. If
we’re missing something, it’s up to us to dig deeper and be open to learning
and stop being lazy.
The moment a pathetic stereotype is created in
our minds is the moment it should be quashed before we create it in speech from
whence it cannot return—or returns with appropriate disdain.
Our wives should not make it easy for us just
because we think that would be best. For who? Ourselves as husbands? No. It’s
best for nobody when adults are spoon fed in such a way they cannot sustain
their next autonomous decision.
Whenever we’re faced with confounding
situations, we’re all tempted to take the easy, lazy route. But it’s not good
enough. It never is.
When we genuinely seek to understand, understanding grows.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.